Part 2
Parents know intuitively that babies in the womb are more vulnerable to the effects of industrial chemicals than adults. A pregnant woman
may avoid using hair dye and nail polish, pumping gas, or painting the
nursery, for example, to protect her baby. This intuition is backed by
science that has unfolded primarily over the past two decades. In 1993
the National Academy of Sciences enumerated, in a Congressionally
mandated study, the primary factors that contribute to children's unique
vulnerability to the harmful effects of chemicals (NAS 1993):
The pace and complexity of growth and development in the womb are unmatched later in life. Three weeks after conception, an embryo, still
only 1/100th the size of a water droplet, has nevertheless grown at
such an explosive rate that were it not to slow down, it would be born
literally the size of a million Earths. Over the next five weeks the
baby constructs the beginnings of elbows, knees, eyelids, nipples, hair
follicles on chin and upper lip, external genitals, primitive internal
organs, a four-chambered heart, working fingers and toes, and even a
footprint (Greene 2004). At no other time in life does a person create
so much from so little in so short a time. Industrial chemicals that
interrupt this intricate process can, at high levels, wreak havoc in the
form of severe birth defects, or at lower levels cause subtle but
important changes in development that surface later in childhood as
learning or behavioral problems, or in adulthood in the form of certain
cancers or perhaps neurodegenerative disease.
A recent review by government scientists of the "critical windows" of vulnerability reveals an urgent need for public health policies that
recognize childhood sensitivity (Selevan et al. 2000). Many of these
windows of vulnerability are found in the early months of human
pregnancies, when cells are multiplying and differentiating into
specific tissues and organs. Exposures during these times can lead to
permanent damage. But a child's vulnerability continues long beyond
early pregnancy: the central nervous system, immune, reproductive and
endocrine systems, for example, continue to mature even after birth (NAS
1993, Makri et al. 2004). As a whole, these windows facilitate more
pronounced risks and effects for chemical exposures in childhood than
adulthood. For example, a mother's exposure to dioxins, mercury, or
certain pesticides during pregnancy could measurably harm her baby,
while affecting her own health perhaps not at all.
In a decades-long mercury poisoning disaster in Minamata, Japan that began in the 1950s, some babies born to women who ate mercury-polluted
seafood died within days of birth, while their mothers were free of
symptoms. Autopsies revealed that in adults, mercury induced lesions
that were concentrated in a few areas of the brain. In the fetus,
however, mercury spawned lesions over nearly the entire brain cortex.
In the decades following Minamata, scientists have developed a much fuller understanding of children's vulnerability to chemicals,
discovering links between a host of health problems — including asthma,
childhood cancer, and brain damage — and such common contaminants as
solvents, pesticides, PCBs, and lead (Trasande and Landrigan, 2004). A
recent National Academy of Sciences study suggests that environmental
factors contribute to at least 28 percent of childhood developmental
disabilities (NAS 2000a).
The latest research investigates not only relationships between disease and exposures, but the root causes of chemically-induced disease
with in utero origins. This research pinpoints traits of a
fetus that contribute to vulnerability: low levels of some
chemical-binding proteins in the blood, immature excretion pathways, and
an immature blood brain barrier, for instance, which combine to
increase the transfer of chemicals from the blood to the aptly named
"target organs" that may ultimately bear the harm.
The risks to a baby derive not only from his or her physical makeup, but also from the very behaviors and events that prepare the baby for
life outside the womb. Beginning in the fifth month of pregnancy,
babies regularly swallow and breathe, building muscles essential for
survival after birth. Through these actions, the lungs and the gut are
filled, again and again, with the same amniotic fluid that collects the
baby's urine. Pollutants like plasticizers and pesticides excreted in
urine accumulate in this fluid and are cycled right back into the baby's
body through the mouth and nose. And in the third trimester the
mother's body dissolves stored, maternal fat, shunting it to the baby
through the blood, but with this fat the child also receives the
persistent pollutants clinging to it, like PCB's, flame retardants, and
dioxins. Faced with such diverse exposures and armed with a body
ill-equipped to rid itself of chemicals, it is small wonder that a
developing baby so often proves vulnerable to chemical exposures (Makri
et al. 2004).
Some studies are beginning to measure the sensitivity of a child relative to an adult for suffering impacts from chemical exposures. For
instance, studies of mutagens called polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) —
target chemicals examined in this study and waste products from burning
gasoline and garbage — found that even though levels of PAHs are
thought to be lower in the fetus than the mother (Srivastava et al.
1986), the fetus bears more cancer-inducing DNA damage from the
exposures (Whyatt et al. 2001).
But health and environmental officials have been slow to act on the wealth of studies on childhood vulnerability produced in the past 20
years. After nearly a decade of review, the Environmental Protection
Agency updated its cancer risk guidelines in 2003 to explicitly
acknowledge the importance of childhood exposures. The agency
concluded, after a review of 23 studies of early life exposures to
cancer-causing chemicals, that carcinogens average 10 times the potency
for babies than adults, and that some chemicals are up to 65 times more
powerful (EPA 2005a).
EPA's new policy, though, targets only cancer. It leaves EPA with no formal policy regarding childrens' vulnerability to chemicals that
damage the immune system, the brain, or the hormone system, kidney,
liver, lungs, thyroid or a host of other potential targets, even though
plenty of evidence says that children face higher risks for harm.
Tags:
© 2012 Created by Sway Ciaramello.
Powered by
.